It is fascinating to see statistics (OK, I admit this may be just me!) that have no bias, emotion or manipulation attached – most statistics have one or more of those things, that’s what statistics are for after all. The money world can often provide these statistics, simply because what we are looking at is a dry list of numbers that have to be evidenced. Also, money doesn’t have to be politically correct.
The list in question is not controversial – Scottish Providents List of claims paid out on their Critical Illness policy between 1/1/09 and 30/06/09. Their only agenda is to show how much they pay out.
Scottish Provident are very proud of their payouts and I guess if you are going to pay out £43m in 6 months, I can’t blame them for wanting to tell everyone.
Clearly, I’m not going to report the whole brochure, here are some things that caught my eye. Oh, actually, before I do that, they told me about a case that really did amaze me.
She never paid a premium!
It concerned a lady who applied for Critical Illness Cover and during the application process discovered that she had breast cancer. Now, this was before Scots Prov had written to her to say ‘Yes, we are happy to insure you’, so way before she had said ‘Yes, I’ll start the policy’ and way way before she had even made a premium payment.
Scots Provident paid the claim. They do that – while an application is in progress they provide free cover. I have asked for the rules on this, but I am impressed.
So, back to the stuff in the brochure. Firstly, we are all interested in whether these policies ‘do’ pay out.
They paid out on 591 claims.
They declined 46 claims. 38 of which were becuase the claim didn’t meet the definition. 8 becuase the client had forgotten to mention crucial things in the application form.
The 38 – is that important? Well, no, not really – I have seen clients who are ill and told them to “send in a claim, you never know…” – I daresay most advisers will. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t.
The 8 – in some ways I am sympathetic and some ways I’m not. As an adviser I have had clients tell me they don’t smoke, while they have a packet of Marlboro Lights showing in their top pocket. Or, memorably, the very young daughter saying “Yes, you do mummy!!!” when her mum was denying smoking. There are other cases where it is an innocent mistake and for those people I am sympathetic.
And just for some detail, of the 591 claims 62% were paid out on cancer.
Cancer Stats!
The immediate thing you see on the cancer stats is the top line of the claims breakdown which it turns out is a slightly macabre ‘cancer’ league table.
Out of 368 claims, 127 were for breast cancer. The next one down is Malignant Melanoma with 27, Testicular 22, Bowel 21, Prostate 21, Lung 13 and since there are another 30 or 40 lines I’m going to stop there.
The other thing that I was curious about was the split of claims men v women – well, it’s 49% men, 51% women, despite the extraordinary Breast Cancer stats.
The average age for cancer claims is 46, actually, that looks like the average claim for all adult illnesses – taking out children.
Children? I get a lump in my throat as usual at the prospects of children suffering, but they do become ill and have accidents (and before I dwell on it, they often cope better than adults) and most companies do provide cover for the children of policyholder.
There were 25 claims for children (in total, not only cancer) …average age 9 in the 6 month period.
Crumbs…
The thing is – I recommend Scottish Provident quite alot. It is good to see stats like this. The interesting thing about Scottish Provident is that I will often turn to them when cheaper companies have said No, or have raised the premium too high, or excluded important things. So, they have a good payout track record, but also, they aren’t just cherry picking the best clients, indeed, almost the reverse.